Analisis Diskresi Administrasi Publik Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Relokasi Pedagang Kaki Lima di Jalan Karang Menjangan Surabaya

Authors

  • Alifia Siddiqyas Putri Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Ananda Nurkhasasih Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Azi Hermawan Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Hanif Nanda Tri A Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Mei Enggar Iis Estikomah Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Rr. Tyara Zettira Hidayat Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Shabrina Afifah Nabila Universitas Hang Tuah

Keywords:

Public administrative discretion, street vendors, relocation policy, public policy conflict, Surabaya

Abstract

Street Vendors (PKL) are part of the informal economic sector that plays an important role in providing employment opportunities and meeting the needs of urban communities. However, the use of public spaces by street vendors often creates various urban management problems, leading local governments to implement relocation policies. In practice, relocation policies frequently trigger conflicts due to differences in interests between the government and street vendors. This study aims to analyze the use of public administrative discretion in resolving conflicts arising from the relocation of street vendors on Karang Menjangan Street, Surabaya. This research employed a qualitative approach through a literature review method by examining relevant books, scientific journals, and previous studies related to public administrative discretion, public policy conflicts, policy implementation, and street vendor management. The findings indicate that administrative discretion plays a significant role in reducing relocation conflicts through direct communication and dialogue, negotiation, adjustment of relocation mechanisms, persuasive approaches by field officers, and the provision of supporting facilities at relocation sites. The effectiveness of discretion is influenced by communication, government flexibility, the competence of field officers, and the availability of resources. Meanwhile, the absence of vendor associations, economic concerns, limited resources, and low public trust become major obstacles. Therefore, the implementation of transparent, accountable, and participatory discretion can support more effective and sustainable conflict resolution in street vendor relocation policies.

References

Birchall, J. (2011). People-Centred Businesses: Co-operatives, Mutuals and the Idea of Membership. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Louisiana State University Press.

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). Routledge.

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Georgetown University Press.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2022). Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.

Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, Politics and the State (2nd ed.). Red Globe Press.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Open University Press.

Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2018). Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed.). Westview Press.

Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

Suparto. (2024). Administrative discretion in Indonesia and the Netherlands: Administrative court authorities and regulations. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development.

Murti, A. B. (2022). Effectiveness of development of culinary PKL center in Surabaya City. MediaTrend, 17(2).

Utomo, F. R., & Triana, R. W. (2014). Descriptive study: Failure factors contributing to program area relocation PKL in Stadium Tambaksari Surabaya. Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 2(2), 115–126.

Musafak, M. N., & Lovisonnya, I. (2025). Penerapan Peraturan Wali Kota Surabaya Nomor 18 Tahun 2023 terhadap penertiban pedagang kaki lima di luar tempat usaha. Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Law, 2(1).

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2022 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 tentang Bangunan Gedung.

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2023). Peraturan Wali Kota Surabaya Nomor 18 Tahun 2023 tentang Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Ketenteraman dan Ketertiban Umum.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Alifia Siddiqyas Putri, Ananda Nurkhasasih, Azi Hermawan, Hanif Nanda Tri A, Mei Enggar Iis Estikomah, Rr. Tyara Zettira Hidayat, & Shabrina Afifah Nabila. (2026). Analisis Diskresi Administrasi Publik Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Relokasi Pedagang Kaki Lima di Jalan Karang Menjangan Surabaya. Journal of Public Affairs Studies, 1(1), 29–39. Retrieved from https://journal.lenvari.org/jopas/article/view/502

Issue

Section

Articles