Rethinking the Measurement Architecture of Waste Bank Sustainability: A Pilot Study of Managers' Communication Competence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61105/jss.v4i2.555

Keywords:

Communication Competence, Institutional Support, Triple Bottom Line, Waste Bank Sustainbility

Abstract

This study examines the validity and reliability of a multidimensional measurement model linking member characteristics and participation, institutional support, managers' communication competence, and three-pillar sustainability (economic, social, environmental) in community-based waste banks in South Tangerang City, Indonesia. As a pilot study (n = 32), it applied reliability analysis (Cronbach's alpha), item-total correlation, and principal component analysis as a proxy for outer loadings across 57 raw items nested within 12 sub-dimensions. Results indicate that managers' communication competence is the most internally coherent construct (alpha ranging from 0.78 to 0.95 across its three sub-dimensions), whereas individual member characteristics and the economic sustainability dimension fail to behave reflectively with respect to their parent constructs (alpha of 0.03 and 0.30, respectively). Even after item purification, the economic dimension could not be reconstituted as a psychometrically sound reflective construct, while the social and environmental dimensions demonstrated strong internal coherence. Correlational evidence further shows that the economic dimension is systematically decoupled from the social and environmental dimensions as well as from communication competence, echoing the 'mission deviation' phenomenon documented in grassroots and social-enterprise research. These findings challenge the routine treatment of triple-bottom-line sustainability as a unidimensional reflective construct in community-based economic institutions and recommend (a) a formative specification for member characteristics and (b) the separation of the economic dimension from the social-environmental dimensions when measuring waste bank sustainability in future, larger-sample structural studiThis pilot study examines the preliminary reliability and measurement structure of a multidimensional model linking member-related factors, institutional support, managers' communication competence, and three dimensions of waste bank sustainability economic, social, and environmental—in community-based waste banks in South Tangerang City, Indonesia. The study employed a quantitative cross-sectional design involving 32 waste bank managers from approximately 25 waste bank units. A total of 57 Likert-scale items across 12 sub-dimensions were examined using internal consistency analysis, item-total correlations, item purification, and principal component analysis (PCA) as an exploratory item-screening technique. The findings indicate that managers' communication competence demonstrated relatively strong internal consistency across confidence/initiative, knowledge, and communication skills, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.78 to 0.95. In contrast, several institutional support dimensions required item refinement, while the current operationalization of economic sustainability did not provide sufficient evidence to support a coherent reflective measurement structure. After item purification, the two remaining economic sustainability items showed a perfect correlation (r = 1.00), suggesting substantial item redundancy rather than substantive evidence of reliability. The preliminary correlation pattern also indicates that the economic dimension may not align empirically with the social and environmental dimensions in this pilot sample. These findings suggest that future measurement models should distinguish demographic characteristics from participation-related constructs, further refine the economic sustainability indicators, and avoid assuming that triple-bottom-line sustainability necessarily forms a single reflective construct. The study provides preliminary evidence for revising the measurement architecture before a larger-scale validation and structural analysises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, A., & Siswantini. (2024). Environmental communication on Indonesian waste management and mobile apps data identification. Multi-Stakeholder Contributions to Asian Environmental Communication.

Alkhajar, E. N. S., Luthfia, A. R., & Sofyan, A. (2023). Influencing people for good: Waste bank and social marketing communication strategies. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1181).

Andersson, S., Svensson, G., Molina-Castillo, F.-J., & Laurell, H. (2022). Sustainable development—Direct and indirect effects between economic, social, and environmental dimensions in business practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

Asteria, D., & Herdiansyah, H. (2022). The role of women in managing waste banks and supporting waste management in local communities. Community Development Journal, 57(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsaa025

Bina, N. S., Armanto, D., & Rajagukguk, W. (2024). Improvement of students’ mathematical communication skills using culture-based webtoon digital comic learning media. TEM Journal, 13(4), 3241–3249. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM134-58

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D. F., & Venaik, S. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1250–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013

Darus, N., Tamimi, M., Nuraeni, N., & Dumbi, K. S. (2026). Determinants of waste management behavior and the potential role of doorstepping as an intervention. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development.

Davies, A. R. (2009). Does sustainability count? Environmental policy, sustainable development and the governance of grassroots sustainability enterprise in Ireland. Sustainable Development.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Kala, K., & Bolia, N. B. (2024). Empowering the informal sector in urban waste management: Towards a comprehensive waste management policy for India. Environment and Development.

Khiawnoi, P., Nakudom, S. S., Noobutr, P., & Kaewzang, U. (2025). Empowering communities: The strategic role of community enterprise entrepreneurs in sustainable development. Sustainability.

Liu, Z., & Zhuang, X. (2022). The impact of organizational concept hybridity on mission deviation in social enterprises: Based on the view of Yin-Yang balance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710

Majeed, A., Batool, S. A., & Chaudhry, M. N. (2017). Informal waste management in the developing world: Economic contribution through integration with the formal sector. Waste and Biomass Valorization.

Maulana, F., Rahman Saeri, F., Amrulloh, M. C., & Arif, L. (2026). Integrating social capital and the MSN approach in community-based waste management: Lessons from the Mentari Waste Bank in Gresik, Indonesia. Community Development.

Sabino, A., Moreira, A., Cesário, F., & Pinto Coelho, M. (2024). Measuring sustainability: A validation study of a Triple Bottom Line (TBL) scale in Portugal. Emerging Science Journal, 8(3), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-03-06

Salam, R., Azhari Aziz Samudra, & Satispi, E. (2025, September 22). Analysis of waste mitigation policy in South Tangerang City, Indonesia: Challenges and solutions for sustainable management. Research in Ecology, 7(4), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v7i4.9885

Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. SAGE Publications.

Syafrial, Febriamansyah, R., Mahdi, & Zamzami, L. (2025). Climate village sustainability and institutional support: A systematic review. Sustinere Journal of Environment and Sustainability.

Widayat, P., & Suci, A. (2025). It is not about money: Exploring motives for public participation in Indonesian waste banks. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 36(6), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-025-00773-9

Zhang, X., Liu, C., Chen, Y., Zheng, G., & Chen, Y. (2022). Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: A critical review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(10), 11471–11513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01932-w

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Caesariano, L., Muljono, P., Fatchiya, A., & Amanah, S. (2026). Rethinking the Measurement Architecture of Waste Bank Sustainability: A Pilot Study of Managers’ Communication Competence. Lenvari: Journal of Social Science , 4(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.61105/jss.v4i2.555

Issue

Section

Articles